Volume 2 - Issue 1 - DBU Journal of K-12 Educational Research - Page 62

60 Cross, L., & Frary, R. (1996). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12 (1), 53. Deddeh, H., Main, E., & Fulkerson, S. R. (2010). Eight steps to meaningful grading. Phi Delta Kappan, 91 (7), 53-58. Dressel, P. (1983). Grades: One more tilt at the windmill. In A. Chickering (Ed.), AAHE Bulletin, 35 (8), 10-13. English, F. W. (1992). Deciding what to teach & test: Developing, aligning, and leading the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Guskey, T. R. (2001). Helping standards make the grade. Educational Leadership, 59 (1), 20-27. Guskey, T. R. (2004). Zero alternatives. Principal Leadership, 5 (2), 49-53. Guskey, T. R. (2006). Making high school grades meaningful. Phi Delta Kappan, 87 (9), 670-675. Guskey, T. R. (2014). Class rank weighs down true learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 95 (6), 15-19. Guskey, T. R., Swan, G. M., & Jung, L. A. (2011). Grades that mean something: Kentucky develops standards-based report cards. Phi Delta Kappan, 93 (2), 52-57. Haptonstall, K. (2010). An analysis of the correlation between standards-based, nonstandards-based grading systems and achievement as measured by the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED3397087) Hooper, J., & Cowell, R. (2014). Standards-based grading: History adjusted true score. Educational Assessment, 19 (1), 58-76. Lezotte, L. W. (2001). Revolutionary and evolutionary: The effective schools movement. Retrieved from https://www. edutopia.org/pdfs/edutopia.org-closing-achievement-gap- lezotte-article.pdf Losen, D. J. (2011). Good discipline: Legislation for education reform. National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524714.pdf Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (1996). The fall and rise of standards-based education. Arlington, VA: NASBE. McClam, S., & Sevier, B. (2010). Troubles with grades, grading, and change: Learning from adventures in alternative assessment practices in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26 (7), 1460-1470. McDaniel, F. (2010). An investigation of the validity of best grading practices (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED748818306) Moss, C. M., &Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Learning targets: Helping student’s aim for understanding in today’s lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Muñoz, M. A., & Guskey, T. R. (2015). Standards-based grading and reporting will improve education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96 (7), 64-68. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: The Commission. O’Connor, K. (2009). How to grade for learning: K-12 (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. O’Connor, K. (2010). A repair kit for grading: 15 fixes for broken grades. Boston, MA: Pearson. O’Connor, K., & Wormeli, R. (2011). Reporting student learning: Despite advances in grading and reporting, imprecision and lack of meaning persist. Educational Leadership, 69 (3), 40- 44. Paeplow, C. G. (2011). Easy as 1, 2, 3: Exploring the implementation of standards-based grading in Wake County elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED3497209) Reeves, D. B. (2004). The case against the zero. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (4), 324-325. Robinson, S. K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative . Westford, MA: Courier Westford, Inc. Schimmer, T. (2012). Ten things that matter from assessment to grading. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Canada, Inc. Schimmer, T. (2014). Grading with a standards-based mindset: Changing how we think about grading is necessary for long- term grading reform. Association for Middle Level Education, 1 (4), 10-13. Schlechty, P. C. (2002). Working on the work: An action plan for teachers, principals, and superintendents. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Scriffiny, P. L. (2008). Seven reasons for standards-based grading. Educational Leadership, 66 (2), 70-74. Lacey S. Rainey, Ed.D.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODc4ODgx