Volume 3 - Issue 1 - DBU Journal for K-12 Educational Research - Page 18

16 and Theses Global. (UMI No. 10140130) Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the "data- driven" mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106 (1), 105-131. Jones, N. D., Buzick, H. M., & Turkan, S. (2013). Including students with disabilities and English learners in measures of educator effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 42 (4), 234- 241. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12468211 Marzano, R., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Milanowski, A. T. (2011). Validity research on teacher evaluation systems based on the framework for teaching [Prepared for presentation at the American Education Research Association Annual meeting in New Orleans, LA, on April 10, 2011]. Retrieved from ERIC: https://eric.ed.gov/ Minnici, A. (2014, Spring). The mind shift in teacher evaluation: Where we stand and where we need to go. American Educator, 38 (1), 22-26. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/ periodical/american-educator/spring-2014 Nordin, T. L. (2014). Feedback filter: Exploring factors affecting teachers' use of observational data in teacher evaluation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global. (UMI No. 3681606) Papay, J. P. (2012, Spring). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82 (1), 123-141. Retrieved from http:// hepg.org/her-home/home Popham, W. J. (2013, March). On serving two masters: Formative and summative teacher evaluation. Principal Leadership , (7), 18-22. Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., Peters, S., Alperin, A., Kettler, R. J., & Kurz, A. (2017, July). Teachers' and school administrators' attitudes and beliefs of teacher evaluation: A preliminary investigation of high poverty school districts. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability. 30(4). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9263-3 Rigsby, D. L. (2014). Teachers' perceptions regarding one district's newly implemented appraisal system (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global. (UMI No. 3670860) Stecker, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., … Chambers, J. (2018). Intensive partnerships for effective teaching enhanced how teachers are evaluated but had little effect on student outcomes (RB-10009-1-BMGF). Retrieved from RAND Corporation: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB10009-1.html Strong, M., Gargani, J., & Hacifazlioglu, O. (2011). Do we know a successful teacher when we see one? Experiments in the identification of effective teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 62 (4), 367-382. doi:10.11177 /0022487110390221 Texas Education Agency. (1991). Texas Teacher Appraisal System Evaluation Study. Retrieved from http://files.eric . ed.gov/ fulltext/ED404288.pdf Texas Education Agency. (2016). T-TESS implementation guidebook. Retrieved from https://teachfortexas.org/ Resource_Files/Guides/T-TESS_Implementation_ Guidebook.pdf Tucker, P. D., & Stronge, J. H. (2005). Linking teacher evaluation and student learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Van der Vegt, R., Smyth, L. F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). Implementing educational policy at the school level: Organization dynamics and teacher concerns. Journal of Educational Administration, 39 (1), 8-23. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/journal/jea Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Retrieved from http:// tntp.org/assets/documents/TheWidgetEffect_2nd_ed.pdf Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11 , 57-67. Julia M. Hyman, Ed.D.